

We need a creative midfielder right??
By: Shaun | January 23rd, 2011
It’s ironic that we’ve lamented all season long about our need for a creative midfielder, yet a glance at the table appears to indicate that we aren’t exactly struggling with creating the chances to score goals.
How many games have we played in the league this season without scoring? 3 games. Sunderland, Man City and Tottenham. Scholes played in 2 out of 3. So, to argue that we didn’t score because of the absence of a truly world class midfielder in our lineup is negated. The highest scoring games we’ve had so far this season have been the 7-1 drubbing of Blackburn and the weekend’s 5-0 win against Birmingham. Scholes was not present in either of those 2 games.
I’m not downplaying the value of Scholes in anyway because I know (as does anyone who watches football and has some common sense) that he possesses the quality that is found in a select few. Yet, how is it that a side that is supposedly bereft of creativity sits on top of the goal scoring charts when our one true creative midfielder is 36 and our top scorer from last season has only registered a meager 2 league goals thus far?
I know that I’ve done my fair share of lamenting on our lack of quality in the middle of the park. However, the stats seem to paint a completely different picture. Are we to assume then that with an actual world class talent in the mould of an Sneijder or Ozil, that we would have run away with the title by now?
The reality is that Berbatov and Nani have been carrying the load for us thus far contributing 24 out of the 48 league goals we’ve scored this season. The 2 have also chipped in with 11 combined assists which is a very impressive number considering the number of goals they have. The one stat I was surprised to see was Rooney also contributing with 9 assists to his name thus having the roles reversed with his strike partner from last season.
Our anxiety for creativity is more pronounced in games where teams play for the draw and set up with everyone behind the ball. But our worst performances this season haven’t necessarily come due to a lack of creativity, but more because of a general sloppiness in our play. The draws against Sunderland, Bolton, Birmingham and our general display against WBA come to mind. Perhaps it was a lack of creativity that clogged our play. But there was also an overall sense of lethargy and disinterest at times that may have been mistaken for a lack of forward invention.
What I think we need then isn’t just a replacement for the creativity of Scholes, but someone who can boss the midfield and speed/slow things up as necessary. Scholes in a sense, could do both. But those aging legs are less able than in times past to fulfill multiple functions simultaneously in a highly efficient way. Could we perhaps try bringing Nani into the middle to work as a creative force behind Rooney and Berba and spend our (probably limited) transfer funds on a midfield enforcer? Ando could perhaps do that job, but can we afford to sit around until he fully matures into the world class midfielder we think he can be? Would we not be better off funneling our limited resources to securing the likes of a Rodwell, Petrovic or M’Vila and giving Nani a shot in that creative position especially since we know that the gap he leaves on the right can be more than capably filled by the returning Valencia?
I know that some might argue that playing Nani in a creative role just behind the front 2 doesn’t work with the formation that we play, but this is all just thinking out loud about our supposed area of weakness.
Just some food for thought.
Some Related Man United Posts:
-
evaldo
-
Nick
-
Omeidheidari
-
Ed 23
-
John Tring
-
Swapnil
-
Wildepuzzles
-
Shaun
-
Wildepuzzles
-
Joey_macg
-
ahmad_h
-
Ivor











