Comments on: Carlos Tevez: Take Two

By: miele

miele — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:26:44 +0000

Also, dang it how do I quit reading bout Tevez and actually earn my pay? It’s so addictive……….

By: miele

miele — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:26:25 +0000

Aso, dang it how do I quit reading bout Tevez and actually earn my pay? It’s so addictive……….

By: miele

miele — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:24:14 +0000

I am duly persuaded, Mr Rockwell. Highly plausible theory.

Because the Ferg is that nefarious / dastradly / cunning.

By: Colin

Colin — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:20:41 +0000

Tevez’s rights are currently owned by a fund managed by Joorabchin.

I think Tevez is getting a raw deal and if we lose him, it will be due to the fact Fergie doesn’t want to pay some agent 32M quid. Tevez is getting a raw deal, but such is life when you sell your rights to an investment fund.

I also think he needs more starts with Rooney, or heck even play a 4-3-3 with Rooney, Tevez, and Berbatov up front. I suppose that is a debate for another day.

If we do keep him, I would expect the squad to be trimmed. Maybe Wes Brown, Failbot Kucz, and possibly Park or Nani, just speculation though.

By: timmyg

timmyg — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:03:11 +0000

Teams own players, not companies.

Although its nothing personal towards him, (he actually seems like a nice guy), his sheer existence on a pitch ruins all palatability in the game and his former and current clubs’ integrity.

By: steven.

steven. — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:42:15 +0000

we paid 20mil for Robbie Keane! .. if Fergie doesen’t shell out for Tevez, you might want to get his pulse checked ..